← Performance

Picture

Rehearse in the head
Mental rehearsal is imagining the execution of a skill, step by step, in as much sensory detail as you can manage. It measurably helps a trained person refine a skill, and it is always worth less than doing the thing. Use it where doing the thing is impossible: learning, injured, traveling, or in the minutes before you are up.

Your script4 to 8 moments, first person, present tense

Moment 1
eyes closed if you can · hold each moment until it is vivid, then tap

Writing a script that earns its minutes

First person, from inside. Not watching yourself on video; being in the body, feeling the grip and the ground. The research on imagery works best when the image includes the feel of the movement, not just the sight of it.
Rehearse the doing, not the trophy. Every moment should be a piece of execution. "The ball leaves my hand soft" belongs; "the crowd goes wild" is the other tradition, the one that failed its testing.
Real tempo. Let each moment take about as long as it takes in life. A rushed rehearsal grooves a rushed skill.
Include the one hard part. A script of only smooth moments rehearses a fantasy. Put in the moment where it usually goes wrong, done right.
The honest limit, stated first. Mental rehearsal has one of the older evidence bases in sport psychology: a 1983 weighing of sixty studies found real effects, strongest for the thinking components of a skill, weakest for raw strength, and always smaller than physical practice; later work found mental-plus-physical at best equal to physical alone. So this page is a supplement, never a substitute: rehearsal improves the marching, not the walls, and imagining outcomes instead of execution is the version that failed. Ten minutes is plenty; more is not better.

Where this practice came from

Four Days in July

Flow 3: The Picture in the Head ยท Episode 1 · the first of eight stories

In July 2001, a twenty-three-year-old left-hander for the Oakland Athletics was coming apart in public.

Barry Zito had arrived in the major leagues with the kind of promise that makes people start talking about the next ten years. Then came a rough outing against Minnesota, and the numbers that went with it: six wins, seven losses, an earned run average above five. For a pitcher carrying that kind of promise, that is not a slump. It is a question.

A slump in a rotation is also a slow-motion thing, which is the part people outside the sport miss. You do not get to fix it tomorrow. You get to sit with it for four days and then go out and find out, in front of everyone, whether it is still there.

The scenes I can give you are imagined: the walk up the tunnel, the shower nobody talks in, the drive home with the radio off, the arithmetic a young man does at two in the morning when the thing he is best at has stopped answering him. What happened next is not imagined, because the family told it and the record kept it.

His father flew in.

Joe Zito was a musician by trade, classically trained, a man who had worked for Nat King Cole. He had also spent years as something stranger and more total than a baseball father. He had, in his son's telling, basically quit music for eleven years to work with the boy.

Hold that number for a second, because it is the strangest fact in the episode and it usually goes by unremarked. Eleven years. Not evenings and weekends. A trained musician's working life, set down and left there.

What he brought to Oakland in July 2001 was not a pitching coach and not a pep talk.

It was a book. Creative Mind, published in 1919 by Ernest Holmes, a work that folds together spiritualism, psychology and philosophy, carried across the country by a father who held the conviction the family had always held: that thought creates form.

For four days they read it together. Five, six, seven hours a day, and that is worth saying slowly, because it is most of a working day, four days running, two men and one book.

I picture a room with the curtains half drawn and the television off, though I do not know the room and neither do you. What is on the record is what they did in it. They read. They took notes. They recorded affirmation tapes in Barry's voice, statements of the pitcher he intended to be, and he listened to them afterward the way an athlete does his exercises.

Then the season resumed, and Barry Zito went 11-1 with a 1.32 earned run average the rest of the way.

That line is real. Sports Illustrated printed it whole, and you can check its shape against the baseball record: he finished 17-8, and seventeen minus six is eleven. The next year he won the Cy Young Award.

If you set out to design one story to sell the power of the mind over performance, you could not do better than this. A churchless miracle with box scores.

So this season is about that story and its whole family tree: where the belief came from, three generations deep in one baseball household; the 1919 book and the tradition behind it; the strange philosopher the father brought next; and then the other lineage, the one that ran through laboratories instead of living rooms, where the same idea, that rehearsing a thing in your head changes how you do it with your body, was stripped of its metaphysics, tested on athletes, and found to be partly, modestly, usefully true.

Because both lineages end at the same practice. An athlete, eyes closed, running the performance in the mind before running it in the world.

The only thing the two traditions disagree about is why it works and how much it can do, and that disagreement is the whole subject of this volume.

The place to start is not with Barry, and not with Joe. It is with a church, and with Barry Zito's grandmother, who founded it.

Wren

The record says this much; the scenes between are imagined. The rest of the season, and the sourcing behind it, runs a few times a week at Wren. One page for the whole practice: /practice/.